Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 42
Filtrar
1.
Infect Dis Clin Microbiol ; 6(1): 60-65, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38633440

RESUMEN

This study examines the effects of the bundle of antimicrobial stewardship measures for prophylactic antibiotics among thoracic surgery patients. A local protocol, based on current guidelines starting from December 2014, was developed by the Infection Control and Thoracic Surgery Teams. The effects of this protocol were assessed by monitoring a total of 1380 patients before and after its implementation from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2022.

3.
Cancer Med ; 13(3): e6997, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38400683

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Hematological malignancy (HM) patients treated with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies are at higher risk for severe COVID-19. A previous single-center study showed worse outcomes in patients treated with obinutuzumab compared to rituximab. We examined this hypothesis in a large international multicenter cohort. METHODS: We included HM patients from 15 centers, from five countries treated with anti-CD20, comparing those treated with obinutuzumab (O-G) to rituximab (R-G) between December 2021 and June 2022, when Omicron lineage was dominant. RESULTS: We collected data on 1048 patients. Within the R-G (n = 762, 73%), 191 (25%) contracted COVID-19 compared to 103 (36%) in the O-G. COVID-19 patients in the O-G were younger (61 ± 11.7 vs. 64 ± 14.5, p = 0.039), had more indolent HM diagnosis (aggressive lymphoma: 3.9% vs. 67.0%, p < 0.001), and most were on maintenance therapy at COVID-19 diagnosis (63.0% vs. 16.8%, p < 0.001). Severe-critical COVID-19 occurred in 31.1% of patients in the O-G and 22.5% in the R-G. In multivariable analysis, O-G had a 2.08-fold increased risk for severe-critical COVID-19 compared to R-G (95% CI 1.13-3.84), adjusted for Charlson comorbidity index, sex, and tixagevimab/cilgavimab (T-C) prophylaxis. Further analysis comparing O-G to R-G demonstrated increased hospitalizations (51.5% vs. 35.6% p = 0.008), ICU admissions (12.6% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.042), but the nonsignificant difference in COVID-19-related mortality (n = 10, 9.7% vs. n = 12, 6.3%, p = 0.293). CONCLUSIONS: Despite younger age and a more indolent HM diagnosis, patients receiving obinutuzumab had more severe COVID-19 outcomes than those receiving rituximab. Our findings underscore the need to evaluate the risk-benefit balance when considering obinutuzumab therapy for HM patients during respiratory viral outbreaks.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , COVID-19 , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Humanos , Rituximab/efectos adversos , Prueba de COVID-19 , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/epidemiología
4.
Zoonoses Public Health ; 71(4): 337-348, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38413371

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The evidence on the prevalence of Lyme borreliosis (LB) is limited, but there is a suspicion of overdiagnosis of LB in recent years. We reviewed the LB diagnosis and treatment-related data in Türkiye, based on the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) 2020 and European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Study Group for Lyme Borreliosis (ESGBOR) 2018 guidelines. By detecting the disagreements between these two, we outlined the areas to be improved for future guidelines. METHODS: We performed a literature search according to the PRISMA guidelines in PubMed, Ovid-Medline, Web of Science, Turkish Medline, Scopus, CINAHL, ULAKBIM TR Index, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library databases. We included the published cases in a database and evaluated according to IDSA and ESGBOR guidelines. We outlined the reasons for misdiagnoses and inappropriate uses of antibiotics. RESULTS: We included 42 relevant studies with 84 LB cases reported from Türkiye between 1990 and December 2022. Among 84 cases, the most common clinical findings were nervous system findings (n = 37, 44.0%), erythema migrans (n = 29, 34.5%) and ophthalmologic findings (n = 15, 17.9%). The IDSA 2020 and ESGBOR 2018 guidelines agreed on the diagnosis of 71 (84.5%) cases; there was an agreement that 31 cases (36.9%) were misdiagnosed and 40 cases (47.6%) were correctly diagnosed, and there was disagreement for 13 cases (15.5%). Serum immunoglobulin M (IgM), IgG measurements by ELISA and western blot were widely performed, and they were effective in definitive diagnosis merely when used according to guidelines. Inappropriate use of antibiotics was detected in 42 (50.0%) of cases which were classified in the following categories: incorrect LB diagnosis, inappropriate choice of antibiotic, inappropriate route of drug administration and prolonged antibiotic treatment. CONCLUSION: Overdiagnosis and non-adherence to guidelines is a common problem. The discordance between seroprevalence and clinical studies necessitates a consensus over the best clinical approach.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Lyme , Enfermedad de Lyme/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Lyme/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Lyme/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Turquía/epidemiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico
5.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 13345, 2023 08 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37587143

RESUMEN

We described the secondary bacterial infections (SBI) among COVID-19 patients in comparison with non-COVID-19 patients. We performed a retrospective case-control study between January 01, 2020 and April 01, 2022. Including the adult patients, who stayed ≥ 72 h in intensive care unit (ICU). In total 405 patients were included, 135 had (33.3%) COVID-19, with similar age and gender. The length of stay in ICU was not different (11.4 vs 8.2, p = 0.109), however mean intubation days were higher among COVID-19 cases (6.5 vs 3.8, p = 0.005), SBI were more common among COVID-19 cases (34% vs 10.7%, p < 0.001). Among the patients with pneumonia, the rate of gram-positive bacteria was higher in COVID-19 group than the control group (39% vs 5%, p = 0.006). The predictors for SBI were having COVID-19 (OR: 2.3, Cl 1.25-4.32, p = 0.008), days of intubation (OR: 1.05, Cl 1.01-1.10, p = 0.004), and being male (OR: 2, Cl 1.12-3.58, p = 0.018). The predictors of mortality were COVID-19 (OR: 2.38, Cl 1.28-4.42, p = 0.006), days of intubation (OR: 1.06, Cl 1.03-1.09, p < 0.001), active hematologic malignancy (OR: 3.1, Cl: 1.33-7.28, p = 0.09), active solid tumors (OR: 2.44, Cl 1.21-4.91, p = 0.012), and coronary artery diseases (OR: 1.8, Cl 1.01-3.52, p = 0.045). The most common SBI in COVID-19 patients were methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. No carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales related infections were detected in COVID-19 patients.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Coinfección , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Retrospectivos , Carbapenémicos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos
6.
Infect Dis (Lond) ; 55(9): 607-613, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37391868

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cefiderocol is generally active against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella spp. (CRK) with higher MICs against metallo-beta-lactamase producers. There is a variation in cefiderocol interpretive criteria determined by EUCAST and CLSI. Our objective was to test CRK isolates against cefiderocol and compare cefiderocol susceptibilities using EUCAST and CLSI interpretive criteria. METHODS: A unique collection (n = 254) of mainly OXA-48-like- or NDM-producing CRK bloodstream isolates were tested against cefiderocol with disc diffusion (Mast Diagnostics, UK). Beta-lactam resistance genes and multilocus sequence types were identified using bioinformatics analyses on complete bacterial genomes. RESULTS: Median cefiderocol inhibition zone diameter was 24 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 24-26 mm) for all isolates and 18 mm (IQR 15-21 mm) for NDM producers. We observed significant variability between cefiderocol susceptibilities using EUCAST and CLSI breakpoints, such that 26% and 2% of all isolates, and 81% and 12% of the NDM producers were resistant to cefiderocol using EUCAST and CLSI interpretive criteria, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cefiderocol resistance rates among NDM producers are high using EUCAST criteria. Breakpoint variability may have significant implications on patient outcomes. Until more clinical outcome data are available, we suggest using EUCAST interpretive criteria for cefiderocol susceptibility testing.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Klebsiella , Humanos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Klebsiella/genética , Cefalosporinas/farmacología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Cefiderocol
7.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 23(11): e482-e488, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37419128

RESUMEN

After the devastating earthquake in Türkiye and Syria in February, 2023, the long-term failure to meet the need for shelter, unfavourable living conditions in tent settlements, poor access to clean drinking water, water suitable for personal hygiene, and sanitary facilities, as well as interruptions in provision of primary health-care services, have emerged as the most important risk factors contributing to the spread of infectious diseases. 3 months after the earthquake, most of these problems persist in Türkiye. Data on the control of infectious diseases are scarce according to the reports prepared by medical specialist associations based on observations of health-care providers working in the region and statements made by the local health authorities. According to these unsystematised data, and considering the conditions in the region, faecal-oral transmissible gastrointestinal infections, as well as respiratory and vector-borne infections, are the main challenges. Vaccine-preventable diseases, such as measles, varicella, meningitis, and polio can be spread in temporary shelters due to interrupted vaccine services and crowded living conditions. In addition to controlling risk factors for infectious diseases, sharing data on the status and control of infectious diseases in the region with the community, health-care providers, and relevant expert groups should be a priority to improve the understanding of the effects of interventions and prepare for possible infectious disease outbreaks.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Transmisibles , Terremotos , Humanos , Enfermedades Transmisibles/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Servicios de Salud , Siria
8.
Infection ; 51(6): 1619-1628, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37162716

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Tocilizumab, a monoclonal IL-6 receptor blocker, is an effective agent for severe-to-critical cases of COVID-19; however, its target patients for the optimum use need to be detailed. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to define its effect among severely ill but non-intubated cases with COVID-19. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medrxiv, and Biorxiv until February 13, 2022, for non-intubated cases, and included randomized-controlled trials (RCT) based on bias assessment. The primary outcomes were the requirement of invasive mechanical ventilation and mortality. Random effect and fixed-effect models were used. The heterogeneity was measured using the χ2 and I2 statistics, with χ2 p ≤ 0.05 and I2 ≥ 50% indicating the presence of significant heterogeneity. We registered the study to the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with the registration number CRD42021232575. RESULTS: Among 261 articles, 11 RCTs were included. The pooled analysis of the 11 RCTs demonstrated that the rate of mortality was significantly lower in the tocilizumab group than in the control group (20.0% and 24.2%, OR: 0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.96, and heterogeneity I2 = 0%. p = 0.82.). The mechanical ventilation rate was lower in the tocilizumab group than the control group (27% vs 35.2%, OR: 0.76, 95% CI 0.67-0.86, and heterogeneity I2 = 6%. p = 0.39). CONCLUSION: Among non-intubated severe COVID-19 cases, tocilizumab reduces the risk of invasive mechanical ventilation and mortality compared to standard-of-care treatment.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Respiración Artificial
10.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 29(2): 221-224, 2023 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35853589

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: SARS-CoV-2 infections with Omicron variants have a high capability of human-to-human transmission. Nevertheless, the duration of isolation for mild cases was shortened to 5 to 7 days. We aimed to detect the duration of viral shedding among healthcare workers (HCWs) with Omicron by using viral culture. METHODS: We prospectively included newly diagnosed nonsevere, symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 positive HCWs. Nasopharyngeal swab samples were obtained consecutively on days 5, 7,10, and 14 of onset of symptoms. The samples were examined by nucleic acid amplification test and viral culture. RESULTS: In total, 55 non-severe patients with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant were included. The mean age of the population was 34 years (range, 23 to 54) and 78% (43/55) were female. The PCR positivity rate on days 5, 7, 10, and 14 was 96.4% (53/55), 87.3% (48/55), 74.545% (41/55), and 41.8% (23/55) consecutively, whereas the viral culture positivity rates were 83% (44/53), 52% (26/50), 13.5% (7/52), and 8% (4/50). Among the patients who became symptom-free, the viral culture positivity rates were 100% (4/4), 58% (7/12), 11% (3/27), and 5% (2/41). DISCUSSION: We showed that among the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant infected patients, viral shedding continues for ≥10 days in 13.5% of all cases and 11% in symptom-free cases. The decision for cessation of isolation according to the presence of symptoms could be reconsidered until further studies disapprove of our results. Meanwhile, the infected HCWs who give care to high-risk patients for severe COVID-19 might extend their isolations ≤10 days after the onset of symptoms, regardless of their symptoms.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedades Transmisibles , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , COVID-19/diagnóstico , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Prueba de COVID-19 , Esparcimiento de Virus
11.
Infect Dis Clin Microbiol ; 5(2): 106-112, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38633010

RESUMEN

Objective: The Turkish Ministry of Health offered two types of vaccines by January 13, 2021, which are CoronaVac (Sinovac Biotech, China) and Pfizer-BioNTech. We aimed to describe the impact of the CoronaVac and Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines on clinical outcomes among hospitalized patients during a six-month period. Methods: We included patients older than 18 years old and hospitalized because of COVID-19 when the vaccines were available. We conducted the study at Koç University Hospital and American Hospital between June 2021, six months after the vaccination started, and December 2021. Results: In total, 444 RT-PCR confirmed hospitalized patients were included. The mean age of the patients was 59 (standard deviation [SD]=18), and 42.8% were female. The most common comorbidity was hypertension (39%), followed by diabetes mellitus (27%), cardiovascular diseases (18.4%), chronic lung diseases (14.6%), cancer (9.2%), and chronic renal diseases (8%). In multivariate analysis, no vaccination (OR=4.7, CI=2.25-10.06; p<0.001), age >65 (OR=5.2, CI=2.25-11.98; p<0.001), cancer (OR=7.6, CI=3.04-19.31; p<0.001), and chronic kidney disease (OR=3.1, CI=1.14-8.74; p=0.026) significantly increased mortality in COVID-19 patients. Eighteen percent of patients were in the intensive care unit (ICU). One hundred eighty-one patients (40.8%) were non-vaccinated before their admission, and their mortality (17.6%) was higher compared to the patients who were vaccinated with at least one type of vaccine (p=0.002). None of the patients who received two doses of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines died. Conclusion: Among the inpatients with COVID-19, the predictors for mortality were being unvaccinated, older age, cancer, chronic kidney disease, and cardiovascular diseases. Among the vaccinated inpatients, having two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was the only effective protective measure against mortality, and two doses of the CoronaVac vaccine had no significant effect in preventing fatality.

12.
Infect Dis Clin Microbiol ; 5(1): 49-52, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38633907

RESUMEN

A 57-year-old female patient presented with fever, nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite, and weight loss within the last two months. Ceftriaxone and metronidazole therapy was started upon discovery of a liver abscess but provided no benefit. Following the of abscess biopsy, the patient developed fever, itching, anemia, acute renal failure, hyperbilirubinemia, and eosinophilia that required intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The Fasciola hepatica antibodies were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Triclabendazole was started, after which the symptoms and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings regressed. Even without eosinophilia, F. hepatica should be considered in cases with a liver abscess that does not respond to antibiotics.

13.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 104(1): 115745, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35843111

RESUMEN

Ceftazidime-avibactam exhibits good in vitro activity against carbapenem resistant Klebsiella carrying OXA-48-like enzymes. We tested two hundred unique carbapenem resistant Klebsiella blood stream isolates (71% with single OXA-48-like carbapenemases, including OXA-48, n = 62; OXA-232, n = 57; OXA-244, n = 17; OXA-181, n = 5) that were collected as part of a multicentre study against ceftazidime-avibactam using Etest (bioMérieux, Marcyl'Étoile, France), 10/4 µg disc (Thermo Fisher) and Sensititre Gram Negative EURGNCOL Plates (Lyophilized panels, Sensititre, Thermo Fisher) with the aim of comparing the performances of the Etest and disc to that of Sensititre. Ceftazidime-avibactam MIC50/90 was 2/>16 mg/L for the entire collection and was 2/4 mg/L for single OXA-48-like producers. Categorical and essential agreements between the Etest and Sensititre were 100% and 97%, respectively. Categorical agreement between the disc and Sensititre was 100%. Etest and 10/4 µg discs are suitable alternatives to Sensititre for ceftazidime-avibactam sensitivity testing for OXA-48-like producers.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Klebsiella , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/farmacología , Carbapenémicos , Ceftazidima/farmacología , Combinación de Medicamentos , Humanos , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , beta-Lactamasas
14.
Infect Dis Rep ; 14(3): 310-314, 2022 Apr 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35645215

RESUMEN

We performed a prospective longitudinal cohort study in two healthcare settings. In total, 909 HCWs out of 3982 (23.35%) were diagnosed with COVID-19 before the vaccination era. Eighty-five per cent of COVID-19 positive HCWs (n = 774) were asymptomatic or mild, and 15% were moderate or severe. The mean age of the infected HCWs in the moderate or severe group was higher than the mild or asymptomatic group (35.4 vs. 31.3 years, p < 0.001). Thirty-two per cent of HCWs were male and the rate of male gender was more frequent in the moderate/severe group (p = 0.009). The rate of those who have cardiovascular diseases (p = 0.003) and diabetes mellitus (p = 0.044) were significantly higher among the HCWs with moderate or severe COVID-19. In multivariate analysis, male gender (OR:1.65, CI:1.11−2.46, p = 0.013), BMI > 30 (OR: 1.9, CI: 1.09−3.51, p = 0.024), and being physician (OR: 2.56, CI:1.45−4.52, p = 0.001) were found to be associated with moderate or severe COVID-19.

15.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 41(5): 841-847, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35301623

RESUMEN

A prospective, multicentre observational cohort study of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella spp. (CRK) bloodstream infections was conducted in Turkey from June 2018 to June 2019. One hundred eighty-seven patients were recruited. Single OXA-48-like carbapenemases predominated (75%), followed by OXA-48-like/NDM coproducers (16%). OXA-232 constituted 31% of all OXA-48-like carbapenemases and was mainly carried on ST2096. Thirty-day mortality was 44% overall and 51% for ST2096. In the multivariate cox regression analysis, SOFA score and immunosuppression were significant predictors of 30-day mortality and ST2096 had a non-significant effect. All OXA-48-like producers remained susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Klebsiella , Sepsis , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Carbapenémicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Infecciones por Klebsiella/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Klebsiella/epidemiología , Infecciones por Klebsiella/microbiología , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Estudios Prospectivos , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , beta-Lactamasas/genética
16.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 28(5): 672-680, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35124258

RESUMEN

SCOPE: This guideline addresses the indications for direct testing of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in asymptomatic individuals in health care facilities, with the aim to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmissions in these settings. The benefit of testing asymptomatic individuals to create a safe environment for patients and health care workers must be weighed against potential unintended consequences, including delaying necessary treatments owing to false positive results and lower quality of care owing to strict isolation measures. METHODS: A total of nine PICOs (population, intervention, comparison, outcome) on the topic of testing asymptomatic individuals was selected by the panel members. Subsequently, a literature search for existing guidelines and systematic reviews was performed on PubMed, Epistemonikos, and RecMap using relevant filters available in each database. Data on article/recommendation type, setting, target population, intervention, and quality of the evidence were extracted. Credibility of the systematic reviews was evaluated using the AMSTAR tool, and level of agreement with available recommendation was evaluated with the AGREE II score. Because the evidence available from systematic reviews was deemed insufficiently updated to formulate relevant recommendations, an additional search targeting relevant guidance documents from major public health institutions and original studies was performed. Provisional recommendations were discussed via web conferences until agreement was reached, and final recommendations were formulated according to the GRADE approach. RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommendations were formulated regarding systematic testing in asymptomatic individuals upon admission to a health care setting, during hospital stay, before elective procedures, and before scheduled nonsurgical procedures. Moreover, recommendations regarding testing of asymptomatic visitors, personal caregivers, and health care workers in health care facilities were presented. Recommendations also were given on contact tracing in asymptomatic patients or health care workers and the possibility of a negative screening test to shorten the quarantine period. Furthermore, if applicable, recommendations were specified to transmission rate and vaccination coverage.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/prevención & control , Atención a la Salud , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Cuarentena
17.
Int J Infect Dis ; 114: 11-14, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34653659

RESUMEN

This paper describes the elimination of healthcare-associated Acinetobacter baumannii infections in a highly endemic region. A prospective, observational study was performed between October 2012 and October 2017. Acinetobacter baumannii were isolated from 59 patients, and >95% similarity was demonstrated among isolates of seven patients (DiversiLab™, BioMérieux). Carbapenemase activity was detected in 15 of 17 (88%) isolates, and all were OXA-23 type. The control of Acinetobacter baumannii outbreaks can be achieved by close follow-up supported by molecular techniques, strict application of infection control measures, and isolation of transferred patients.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Acinetobacter , Infección Hospitalaria , Infecciones por Acinetobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Acinetobacter/epidemiología , Infecciones por Acinetobacter/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Bacterianas , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Turquía , beta-Lactamasas/genética
18.
J Med Microbiol ; 71(12)2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36748503

RESUMEN

Introduction. Aminoglycosides are used for the treatment of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CPK) infections. 16S rRNA methyltransferases (RMTs) confer resistance to all aminoglycosides and are often cocarried with NDM.Hypothesis/Gap Statement. There is a dart of studies looking at the aminoglycoside resistance mechanisms for invasive CPK isolates, particularly in OXA-48 endemic settings.Aim. We aimed to determine the prevalence of RMTs and their association with beta lactamases and MLSTs amongst aminoglycoside-resistant CPK bloodstream isolates in an OXA-48 endemic setting.Methodology. CPK isolates (n=181), collected as part of a multicentre cohort study, were tested for amikacin, gentamicin and tobramycin susceptibility using custom-made sensititre plates (GN2XF, Thermo Fisher Scientific). All isolates were previously subjected to whole-genome sequencing. Carbapenemases, RMTs, MLSTs and plasmid incompatibility groups were detected on the assembled genomes.Results. Of the 181 isolates, 109(60 %) were resistant to all three aminoglycosides, and 96 of 109(88 %) aminoglycoside-resistant isolates carried an RMT (85 ArmA, 10 RmtC, 4 RmtF1; three isolates cocarried ArmA and RmtC). Main clonal types associated with ArmA were ST2096 (49/85, 58 %) and ST14 (24/85, 28 %), harbouring mainly OXA-232 and OXA-48 +NDM, respectively. RmtC was cocarried with NDM (5/10) on ST395, and NDM +OXA-48 or NDM +KPC (4/10) on ST14, ST15 and ST16. All RMT producers also carried CTX-M-15, and the majority cocarried SHV-106, TEM-150 and multiple other antibiotic resistance genes. The majority of the isolates harboured a combination of IncFIB, IncH and IncL/M type plasmids. Non-NDM producing isolates remained susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam.Conclusion. Aminoglycoside resistance amongst CPK bloodstream isolates is extremely common and mainly driven by clonal spread of ArmA carried on ST2096 and ST14, associated with OXA-232 and OXA48 +NDM carriage, respectively.


Asunto(s)
Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos , Infecciones por Klebsiella , Humanos , Aminoglicósidos/farmacología , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genética , Prevalencia , Estudios de Cohortes , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , beta-Lactamasas/genética , Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos/genética , Metiltransferasas/genética , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Infecciones por Klebsiella/epidemiología
20.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 40(12): 2575-2583, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34347191

RESUMEN

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis for the effectiveness of Favipiravir on the fatality and the requirement of mechanical ventilation for the treatment of moderate to severe COVID-19 patients. We searched available literature and reported it by using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Until June 1, 2021, we searched PubMed, bioRxiv, medRxiv, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar by using the keywords "Favipiravir" and terms synonymous with COVID-19. Studies for Favipiravir treatment compared to standard of care among moderate and severe COVID-19 patients were included. Risk of bias assessment was performed using Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) and ROBINS-I assessment tool for non-randomized studies. We defined the outcome measures as fatality and requirement for mechanical ventilation. A total of 2702 studies were identified and 12 clinical trials with 1636 patients were analyzed. Nine out of 12 studies were randomized controlled trials. Among the randomized studies, one study has low risk of bias, six studies have moderate risk of bias, and 2 studies have high risk of bias. Observational studies were identified as having moderate risk of bias and non-randomized study was found to have serious risk of bias. Our meta-analysis did not reveal any significant difference between the intervention and the comparator on fatality rate (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.64-1.94) and mechanical ventilation requirement (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.13-1.95). There is no significant difference in fatality rate and mechanical ventilation requirement between Favipiravir treatment and the standard of care in moderate and severe COVID-19 patients.


Asunto(s)
Amidas/administración & dosificación , Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Pirazinas/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amidas/efectos adversos , Antivirales/efectos adversos , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/virología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Pirazinas/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Respiración Artificial , SARS-CoV-2/efectos de los fármacos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...